Year: 2012 Genre: Mystery, Thriller Director: James McTeigue Starring: John Cusack, Luke Evans, Alice Eve
Description: When a madman begins killing inspired by Edgar Allan awful gained working life, young Baltimore detective joins Poe could not make his stories come true. Review: I'm a big fan of the whole of the Whodunnit movies, and I wanted to see what was in store the peaks. I got the impression that it would be just like any other killer Ripper/19th old Jack in the movie and it was predictable. I was right in my assessment, but Raven Insp the clich s of great movie mainly because it?:
Year: 2013 Genre: Crime, Drama, Thriller Director: Allen Hughes Starring: Mark Wahlberg, Russell Crowe, Catherine Zeta-Jones
Description: City is full of injustice, ex-cop Billy Taggart is looking for redemption and revenge, then double-crossed and framed then the most powerful figure: Mayor Nicholas Hostetler. Review: I give it five for the cast, but two obtuse script and predictable, that inexplicably appeared in the black list of the best scripts do not - what category should stay. In development hell for years, he should at least be a major overhaul to simplify the story (you walk around and you do be, have minute) and raised his voice above the gutter. Whatever the studio executives to put on the blacklist to stop laughing about the words and trying to make money all it is a good scenario. Wahlberg is always a pleasure to spend time with, but the falseness of many scenes and car chase clunkiest never defeat your efforts to entertain. Much of the film is predictable and many scenes are just actors of the test materials with lower quality. The beautiful, beautiful Catherine Zeta Jones is completely lost in this piece of filth. Somewhere in this film, it might be a good idea of ​​the corruption in the city. Unfortunately, no one seems to have the courage to grab by the throat, beat him in the form and present it to the public with the spirit, style and originality. As I said at the top, is painting by numbers.
Year: 1979 Genre: Drama, War Director: Francis Ford Coppola Starring: Marlon Brando, Martin Sheen, Robert Duvall
Description: During the US-Vietnam War, Captain Willard is sent on a mission in Cambodia killed dangerous rebel colonel who had established himself as a god among a local tribe. Review: My favorite movie of all time. This was a defective part of the work of Coppola and seeing the dark heart documentary has become even more attractive. Coppola was at this time king of Hollywood after making GodfatherII bachelor and developed the ego necessary to even dare to try to make a movie like Apocalypse Now For sheer arrogance, he went to the Philippines with a partial write and see what I thought was going to do when he got there. As Captain Willard thought he would know what to do, and became Colonel Kurtz compound. And Willard, knew he would do when he got there. This is a masterpiece of American cinema, beautifully photographed and the river is a metaphor, and as a perfect backdrop for the story. What I like about Apocalypse Now is not offering answers or conclusions. Therefore, because of this open incomplete angered some viewers who want their films to be much more evident. This film that defies categorization. Some call it a war film it's nothing, really is a man's personal study. The best photo about Vietnam Platoon is in my opinion, and if the viewer is looking for a rereading of the Vietnam War go there first for answers. Coppola to be commended for his opinion about the war bureaucracy that very effectively conveys the meeting with Gen.Corman and Lucas (Harrison Ford) and the Playmate Review. The audacity of Kilgore him a memorable character and makes dawn attack will always be a classic.It Hollywood is a nearly final cruise to a very surreal psychedelic making a film is not accessible all . Very hard to see, but also rewarding. I could offer my explanations of each scene, but it would be totally useless. This film is expected to interpretation rather than immediate contemplation gratification.A little note on the bottom of the page, for sure if the public for the first time in Apocalypse Now, see the original First Redux version is, I think, over the intention of the fan and more a curiosity than a new and improved version of the film
Year: 2004 Genre: Adventure, Drama, History Director: Wolfgang Petersen Starring: Julian Glover, Brad Pitt, Eric Bana
Description: Adaptation of Homer's great epic, film shows an attack on Troy by the united Greek forces and tells the story of the people involved. Review: Finally got to see this film in theaters in El Paso according to Labor Day. At first I thought amused me much of the movie, but as time passed, he left the regular theaters in the city, and I realized that Id wish Id gone to see it. I remember listening to a number of critics blasting a movie, it's terrible, and I wanted to judge for myself. I am so glad I finally saw this film is not the usual shock movie.This Titans / Jason and the Argonauts kind of film in which the gods continuously, and portrayed as more important and more powerful than humble people. In fact, this movie is completely ignorant of the gods called instead focus disregarded where it belongs - the fighters themselves. Researched from the Iliad and other stories surrounding the mythical times of the Trojan War as a primary school geek obsessed with our own, gy andthe Dungeons & Dragons. Instead of hearing white film demystifies the Trojan War, and treat it in the way that could have happened really. We see that the elderly who constantly refers to the so-called gods come to be so silly. One said lines when Hector (Eric Bana), suggesting that Apollo did not strike down Achilles (Brad Pitt), the statue meggyaláztáka. Hector is telling that certainly seems to have taught the gods old worship.I critic Brad Pitt as a secondary talent change is famous only for its appearance, but in this movie really surprised. He is the real star of the film. Achilles is certainly the most interesting and entertaining. I applaud the efforts Brad Pitt in the character of the tragic hero. Achilles admits that he is the son of a goddess, and not immortal invulnerable. The movie basically shows how to make a flower with rumors of a legend in itself. Achilles immortalized in legend. It also refers to a favorite scene, when he inspired his men and headed for the invasion greatly outnumbered and still win. Later, the same scene that mocks the gods of the Greeks called Trojans andthe worship the statue was beheaded. I found this scene symbolizes the movie itself. The gods are not all characters and supernatural power audience.Instead and impossible feats to use fuse realism. Méga Achilles' death is more realistic than the myth. The myth of Paris did not kill Achilles with an arrow, but because it does not really manage Apollo.If hand combat skills are one thing, did not like this film was a hero in the transformation Paris. Paris was a coward in the original myth, and I saw no reason to spend a hero of the night at the movies. I think fans of Orlando Bloom will be able to support him as a bad boy, and received a soulless transformation of Paris is a better archer Robin Hood. Although this film is far from the epic masterpiece that the producers hoped, and is announced does not deserve the bad publicity it received criticism. I applaud the filmmakers, and I hope megvennéma DVD.
Year: 2006 Genre: Action, Fantasy, History Director: Zack Snyder Starring: Gerard Butler, Lena Headey, Dominic West
Description: King Leonidas and a force of 300 men fight the Persians at Thermopylae in 480 BC Review: This film is not for everyone. It's a lot to say about the film in general, of course, but especially among the critics are clashing point, we want to see the film? Why give people an idea of ​​blowing visual experience or intelligent plot twists and clever dialogue to entertain and amaze them is more important to describe the area of ​​the so-called? First of all, it is a film that allows accurate analysis. In general, only one epic battle scene in the whole thing. Much of the camera work and visual effects. It is designed to be a work of art in every shot as it seems to be. The colors, characters, clothing, backgrounds, ... given so much attention to every little detail. You can edit immediately biggest battles youll unique in the period. To show exactly what happened during the war, when there was a very slow process. Slowly pull the air in blood spatters the deadly wounds, decapitated heads traveling across the screen in slow-motion ... its all there. On the other hand, the whole movie is probably more than the story, described in a sentence or two, in the sense that it is not complicated. This dialogue is simple and often talk about moral values ​​such as freedom and honor. You want to look at the script, it seems likely to be divided into two groups of idealistic visions of how life after beReviewers name that has nothing more to offer, it looks like any other film. 21 century epic movie, they call it passion or love it or hate it even more stupid and foolish move and throw it like a piece of garbage of clich? phrases. I do not feel in a position to get into this argument. Usually, this is really a film about the result in a fair trial, draw from both sides of the issue. It is a. On the one hand, to visually one of the best watch a movie, there is no doubt. Every detail, background, every special effect of curtain so mindblowingly stunning. On the other hand area and the dialogue, there is a simple and honest kind of dumb. I fight for freedom! Id rather die in honor then live in shame! Does this sound familiar? Of course, this film is a spin on his head, that was never intended in the first place for a unique environment that can be discussed. But it is still an objective point of view that in this section, so notedNow it nice and all, but the whole film, which should be what? It's worth watching, or what? I do not think so. For me, the good outweighs the bad by miles. Did me a second start and did not let go. Every war movie, every scene had me on the edge of my seat. Cries of war, soldiers from the powerful visuals, the acting, everything was just stunning ... The film is not something that was a very nice feeling for a moment experienceI. DealIf beautiful landscapes are easily impressed by other people's did.So a nice camera work and editing, and I can not imagine why we see a strong move, you can go to. Reg. Online. Will miss you if necessary. This comic was translated to the big screen, there's a lot more difficult to see ... AweHowever itll leave you a good story, clever plot twists, the film world in search of some of the innovations of this move. 300 This is nothing, nor will. I really enjoyed this movie, but I refuse to be like the people you know will be there, and that's understandable. This site offers tons of views instead of just bias in the theater in your mind about what you want to see for yourself when you go to check involved.
Year: 2010 Genre: Adventure, Family, Fantasy Director: Chris Columbus Starring: Logan Lerman, Brandon T. Jackson, Steve Coogan
Description: A teenager learns a descendant of the Greek gods, and the gods of the adventure has been an ongoing battle. Review: I do not come to the idea of ​​competition. I have not read the books and I have read only one review paper.Yes's opinion, are not borrowed from the film, but otherwise it does not, the film that was taken, also, seriously, Harry, P. Like most of the players as shown, is not to look at my clock, and up.I Ham film (two hours), this is a good sign that I did not like ride.What what was missing most of the mythology to enjoy throughout the year. It was, as assumed knowledge. It does not suffer from the greatest minds of all the things, things I do well, I do not (filma.) is the same as for the music, but he was into filthy words. Hell.S / Fx level would not be accepted unless the highway is important, especially, Hades (the place is not God). But, at the same time, the human god this is my producer of the film liking.Maybe P. In order to fill the gap left by John Henry, the main character in this film as Harry looks about the same age, it does not seem to repeat the last film.I a (DVD) to watch.
Year: 2012 Genre: Action, Comedy, Crime Director: Phil Lord Starring: Jonah Hill, Channing Tatum, Brie Larson
Description: Pair of underachieving cops are sent back to a local high school to blend and reduce synthetic drug ring. Review: Precursor: I just got back into town two days ago, and made plans to see one of my old friends in the evening. I did not want to see this movie, and it would have in any other circumstances, but my friend really wanted tickets were free, so I went. Examine yourself: It's not disrespect to Jonah Hill, his fashion humor or his fans at all, but I personally have grown tired of what now seems to be plenty of wishes being a Hangover and Superbads. (The success of Project X seriously worries me ...). In any case, there are methods that mind set tonight, and since I did not laugh once during the trailer 21 JS, green or red tape ... I really did not expect much from the experience except to leave the house and catch up with the man. But damn. I honestly thought this movie was great. Yes, there were parts that I do not like ... little dialogue seemed to be vulgar to be strictly for the sake of vulgar ... There is usually expected Jonah Hill are protected countless penis jokes and an extremely unnecessary shock gag, but most of the film, for me, surprisingly satirical / smart / relevant in today's society, self-conscious and situational fun. Even the dumbest of the most profane movies jokes and cliche? E seem to know that they like and get the corresponding comic build / context in at least Account smile. This movie had some surprisingly clever through dialogue and some of the best supporting characters I've seen in recent comedies (Ice Cube, Principal, etc.). What really stood out for me is editing. 21 Jump Street has some of the most awkward humorous cross shot, scene changes and musical integration. Despite its flaws, I found that it's damn hard to hate the movie and would recommend it to anyone looking for a fun weekend movie.All all ... original, clever, vulgar still respectable comedy with some heart. IMO a very good career move for Hill and Tatum. Stoked to continue.
Year: 2002 Genre: Adventure, Family, Fantasy Director: Chris Columbus Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson
Description: Harry ignores warnings not to return to Hogwarts, only to find the school held a series of mysterious attacks and a strange voice haunting him. Review: If you are first, and then like it, you will love this! Tam is a darker atmosphere of this time around and more characters, have introduced the, which includes Gilderoy Lockhart (Kenneth Branagh cheerful played), Draco Malfoys father of, Lucius (great performance Jason Isaacs, how accurately the I imagined, that lik from the books !), thistles father's, Arthur and ratyèra mysterious elf at home (on the Fortunately, there is there is nowhere in the vicinity of, such as Annoying as characters of gold CG had done in other films, but I do I'm gonna appointed a no the names of ... *, cough * JarJarBinks * cough *) Film joined the in the novel, but as a film the past we have lacked the heart currently in the phase of, when we started, to learn a few more about the characters, especially of hatred, hostile of the relationship between Harry Lefkowitz and a professor of Snape (which has been seriously underfunded for in this movie! Area) to all his definitely worth checking out, the time of running in the 160 minutes it might seem somewhat long, but it does not seem, that a long, after it is I watch. By the way, whatever you does not leave the, as long as shall be loans and advances ended, namely the you will miss the some extra a treat ...
Year: 2011 Genre: Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi Director: Martin Campbell Starring: Ryan Reynolds, Blake Lively, Peter Sarsgaard
Description: test pilot is granted an alien ring that bestows him with otherworldly powers, as well as in the general intergalactic squadron job of keeping peace within the universe. Review: Well, let me start by saying that this movie is a wonderful movie. There's not a terrible film, as most critics say. I think the critics also raised the expectations for Thor and X-Men: First Class. We should not compare Green Lantern and all these movies. It is now at 24% on Rotten Tomatoes, which is too low. This is probably the high 60s, before the release of Thor and X-Men: First class.The of a good film, not a terrible general Shop. Ryan Reynolds as Hal Jordan's big and very likeable. It definitely fits the role as Hal Jordan is very good. Blake Lively great and very sexy, shes not only beautiful face than most of us. Peter Sarsgaard is a great actor, and he plays the evil Hector Hemmond very good and interesting. People usually try their best, andthe end of days doing a great job, certainly not Oscar worthy performances, special effects though. The quite wonderful and very rewarding to say the least. Although sometimes it feels a little CGIish, but not too big to lift. I have to say I am a little disappointed that Parallax looks, feels a bit fake at times, but it's not terrible in any sense of the útbó l. Also, the film does not take itself seriously, which is pretty nice. Perhaps the reason that the judges did not like it so much. They want to be a sad story, and other serious personal. Unlike Thor and the X-Men, The Green Lantern and more children friendly.The the film's main problem was that trying to squeeze things in comics andthe personal életéta other characters. It seems that there are so many sequels and the other characters. He's a kind of focus on too many characters. Also it means to be a bit confusing at times, it is certainly necessary, it would be better, but the results are mediocre best.Overall a fun summer movie Green Lantern. Although close to the realm of The Dark Knight, I do not need. The 3D was actually pretty good, andthe special effects are memorable. There is no doubt that the judges very difficult and unfair Green Lantern. At the end of the day, do not listen to the critics. Make up your mind and make this movie. At the end of the day, you need only your opinion that's important to you. You may agree with the judges, or if you can. However, do not let this movie because of the low Rotten Tomatoes score.
Year: 2013 Genre: Comedy Director: Don Scardino Starring: Steve Carell, Steve Buscemi, Mason Cook
Description: When street magicians do their tricks are starting to look old show, attendees superstar Burt Wonderstone and Anton Marvelton looking to save on their actions - and their friendship - bold maneuver by holding their own. Review: The problem with most reviews is that, today, many people have lost their innocence and playfulness of the world every day nev.The when the family would go to the movies and buy popcorn and Coke and all that has been replaced by a strange gift was nothing more than a critical evaluation and gross! One! The film deals with a similar issue when Burt Vonderstone one loses the ability to understand that although the old trick with a new one that can bring wonderment and oldest audience.Lets what to stop and see the movie! His life is not a movie or drama should be like The Green Mile. Throw back to the era of stage magicians, when his innocent rabbits out of a hat trying to get the surprise of possible cross-legged in front of the character Chris rov.The angelesque a children seen at the entrance to the show in terms of changing social attitudes towards what is considered fun (and Jim Carrey is hysterical). Yes, the story is not meant to be anything serious in nature, but that is the basic content little.Todai do not have to believe us when films like ass kickass and high ratings guarantees are involved, and their kids get bad rap.In Australia all my its sad, funny movies, among other things, to see, innocence and hysterics in the movie was funny (and it's late session 1/4 full). If you still laugh like Jerry Lewis and ... I love you like a funny movie back to the future ... You'll love hearing her say 13-year-old kickass suck my * & # $ is the fun you can ... then you will miss the boat on what will be an opportunity to is.Take really fun, and no one was surprised laugh, be around ... Burt VOnderstone leave and let the joy of my heart I clarify a couple of hours.
20 
5
